linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.4 027/146] jhash: Update jhash_[321]words functions to use correct initval

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1442307861-32031-27-git-send-email-lizf@kernel.org>
Date:	Tue, 15 Sep 2015 17:02:22 +0800
From:	lizf@...nel.org
To:	stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.4 027/146] jhash: Update jhash_[321]words functions to use correct initval

From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>

3.4.109-rc1 review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------


commit 2e7056c433216f406b90a003aa0ba42e19d3bdcf upstream.

Looking over the implementation for jhash2 and comparing it to jhash_3words
I realized that the two hashes were in fact very different.  Doing a bit of
digging led me to "The new jhash implementation" in which lookup2 was
supposed to have been replaced with lookup3.

In reviewing the patch I noticed that jhash2 had originally initialized a
and b to JHASH_GOLDENRATIO and c to initval, but after the patch a, b, and
c were initialized to initval + (length << 2) + JHASH_INITVAL.  However the
changes in jhash_3words simply replaced the initialization of a and b with
JHASH_INITVAL.

This change corrects what I believe was an oversight so that a, b, and c in
jhash_3words all have the same value added consisting of initval + (length
<< 2) + JHASH_INITVAL so that jhash2 and jhash_3words will now produce the
same hash result given the same inputs.

Fixes: 60d509c823cca ("The new jhash implementation")
Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
---
 include/linux/jhash.h | 17 +++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/jhash.h b/include/linux/jhash.h
index 47cb09e..348c6f4 100644
--- a/include/linux/jhash.h
+++ b/include/linux/jhash.h
@@ -145,11 +145,11 @@ static inline u32 jhash2(const u32 *k, u32 length, u32 initval)
 }
 
 
-/* jhash_3words - hash exactly 3, 2 or 1 word(s) */
-static inline u32 jhash_3words(u32 a, u32 b, u32 c, u32 initval)
+/* __jhash_nwords - hash exactly 3, 2 or 1 word(s) */
+static inline u32 __jhash_nwords(u32 a, u32 b, u32 c, u32 initval)
 {
-	a += JHASH_INITVAL;
-	b += JHASH_INITVAL;
+	a += initval;
+	b += initval;
 	c += initval;
 
 	__jhash_final(a, b, c);
@@ -157,14 +157,19 @@ static inline u32 jhash_3words(u32 a, u32 b, u32 c, u32 initval)
 	return c;
 }
 
+static inline u32 jhash_3words(u32 a, u32 b, u32 c, u32 initval)
+{
+	return __jhash_nwords(a, b, c, initval + JHASH_INITVAL + (3 << 2));
+}
+
 static inline u32 jhash_2words(u32 a, u32 b, u32 initval)
 {
-	return jhash_3words(a, b, 0, initval);
+	return __jhash_nwords(a, b, 0, initval + JHASH_INITVAL + (2 << 2));
 }
 
 static inline u32 jhash_1word(u32 a, u32 initval)
 {
-	return jhash_3words(a, 0, 0, initval);
+	return __jhash_nwords(a, 0, 0, initval + JHASH_INITVAL + (1 << 2));
 }
 
 #endif /* _LINUX_JHASH_H */
-- 
1.9.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/