[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1442307861-32031-128-git-send-email-lizf@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 17:04:03 +0800
From: lizf@...nel.org
To: stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Wilson Kok <wkok@...ulusnetworks.com>,
Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.4 128/146] bridge: use _bh spinlock variant for br_fdb_update to avoid lockup
From: Wilson Kok <wkok@...ulusnetworks.com>
3.4.109-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
commit 1d7c49037b12016e7056b9f2c990380e2187e766 upstream.
br_fdb_update() can be called in process context in the following way:
br_fdb_add() -> __br_fdb_add() -> br_fdb_update() (if NTF_USE flag is set)
so we need to use spin_lock_bh because there are softirq users of the
hash_lock. One easy way to reproduce this is to modify the bridge utility
to set NTF_USE, enable stp and then set maxageing to a low value so
br_fdb_cleanup() is called frequently and then just add new entries in
a loop. This happens because br_fdb_cleanup() is called from timer/softirq
context. These locks were _bh before commit f8ae737deea1
("[BRIDGE]: forwarding remove unneeded preempt and bh diasables")
and at the time that commit was correct because br_fdb_update() couldn't be
called from process context, but that changed after commit:
292d1398983f ("bridge: add NTF_USE support")
Signed-off-by: Wilson Kok <wkok@...ulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com>
Fixes: 292d1398983f ("bridge: add NTF_USE support")
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
[lizf: Backported to 3.4: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Zefan Li <lizefan@...wei.com>
---
net/bridge/br_fdb.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
index 5ba0c84..b5597bb 100644
--- a/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_fdb.c
@@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ void br_fdb_update(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *source,
fdb->updated = jiffies;
}
} else {
- spin_lock(&br->hash_lock);
+ spin_lock_bh(&br->hash_lock);
if (likely(!fdb_find(head, addr))) {
fdb = fdb_create(head, source, addr);
if (fdb)
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ void br_fdb_update(struct net_bridge *br, struct net_bridge_port *source,
/* else we lose race and someone else inserts
* it first, don't bother updating
*/
- spin_unlock(&br->hash_lock);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&br->hash_lock);
}
}
--
1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists