[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1442281471.2298.76.camel@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 02:44:31 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.32 15/62] udp: fix behavior of wrong checksums
On Sun, 2015-09-13 at 00:56 +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> 2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>
> ------------------
>
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
>
> commit beb39db59d14990e401e235faf66a6b9b31240b0 upstream.
>
> We have two problems in UDP stack related to bogus checksums :
>
> 1) We return -EAGAIN to application even if receive queue is not empty.
> This breaks applications using edge trigger epoll()
>
> 2) Under UDP flood, we can loop forever without yielding to other
> processes, potentially hanging the host, especially on non SMP.
>
> This patch is an attempt to make things better.
>
> We might in the future add extra support for rt applications
> wanting to better control time spent doing a recv() in a hostile
> environment. For example we could validate checksums before queuing
> packets in socket receive queue.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
>
> CVE-2015-5364
[...]
As there were two different problems, each deserving its own CVE ID,
this also fixes CVE-2015-5366.
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists