lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:28:33 +0200
From:	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:	Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH-v2 0/3] mmc: sdhci-pxav3: Fix tabbing issue

On 7 September 2015 at 13:31, Vaibhav Hiremath
<vaibhav.hiremath@...aro.org> wrote:
> Trivial patch-series, which fixes the tabbing issue in the driver,
> uses the BIT macro for bit fields and prints notice on -EPROBE_DEFER
> in sdhci_add_host() function on regulator unavailability.
>
> V1 => V2
> ========
>  - Fixed all comments from Joe, mostly alignment changes
>  - Separated BIT macro usage patch into new one.
>  - changed error to kernel notice for EPROBE_DEFER in sdhci_add_host()
>
> Note: This patch-series should get merged before another series -
>
> [PATCH-v2 0/7] mmc: sdhci-pxav3: Enable support for PXA1928 SDCHI controller
>
> Vaibhav Hiremath (3):
>   mmc: sdhci-pxav3: Fix tabbing issue
>   mmc: sdhci-pxav3: Use BIT macro for bit field definitions
>   mmc: sdhci: print notice on -EPROBE_DEFER in sdhci_add_host() fn
>
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-pxav3.c | 46 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c       |  5 ++++-
>  2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>

Hi Vaibhav,

FYI, I won't be picking up any of these patches. Primarily because I
don't think they improves the code and other people also seems to
agree to that.

Regarding patch1 and similar patches which deals with only fixing
checkpatch warnings/errors. In most cases I don't like such changes,
as they makes it harder to use "git blame" when you want to find out
which commit that introduced a change.

Kind regards
Uffe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ