linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: nVMX: enhance allocate/free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <55F81515.8090405@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:54:45 +0200
From:	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:	Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@...mail.com>
Cc:	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>, Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>,
	Wincy Van <fanwenyi0529@...il.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: nVMX: enhance allocate/free_vpid to handle
 shadow vpid



On 15/09/2015 12:30, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> +	if (!nested) {
> +		vpid = find_first_zero_bit(vmx_vpid_bitmap, VMX_NR_VPIDS);
> +		if (vpid < VMX_NR_VPIDS) {
>  		vmx->vpid = vpid;
>  		__set_bit(vpid, vmx_vpid_bitmap);
> +		}
> +	} else {
> +		vpid = find_first_zero_bit(vmx_vpid_bitmap, VMX_NR_VPIDS);
> +		if (vpid < VMX_NR_VPIDS) {
> +			vmx->nested.vpid02 = vpid;
> +			__set_bit(vpid, vmx_vpid_bitmap);
> +		}

Messy indentation, and a lot of duplicate code.  Can you instead have
(which I think was Jan's suggestion too):

static int allocate_vpid(void);
static void free_vpid(int vpid);

That said, I like the simple solution to the "too many VPIDs for each L1
VCPU" processor.

Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/