[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <55F82252.4090900@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:51:14 +0200
From: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coccinelle: tests: unsigned value cannot be lesser than
zero
On 09/15/2015 03:31 PM, Julia Lawall wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>
>>>> v@p
>>>> (
>>>> *< 0
>>>> |
>>>> *<= 0
>>>> )
>>> It does not, and is not intended to, work. The branches of a disjunction
>>> should be complete expressions.
>> Will the following SmPL approach be more appropriate then?
>>
>> (
>> *v@p < 0
>> |
>> *v@p <= 0
>> )
> Actually, all of
>
> v < 0 (never true)
> v <= 0 (same as v == 0)
> v >= 0 (always true)
>
> would seem to merit attention. Andrzej, what do you think?
You are right, the 2nd case should be also addressed,
such code is misleading.
I will prepare then 2nd version of the patch.
Regards
Andrzej
>
> julia
>
>
>> Regards,
>> Markus
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists