[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <4BA4FC50-F327-43CD-9560-93DE545146A1@linuxhacker.ru>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:57:12 -0400
From: Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>
To: Trevor Woerner <twoerner@...il.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/19] staging/lustre/lmv: fix potential null pointer dereference
Hello!
On Sep 15, 2015, at 9:26 AM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
> On 09/14/15 18:41, green@...uxhacker.ru wrote:
>> Reviewed-on: http://review.whamcloud.com/14605
>
> I'm confused why the patch found in this email doesn't match the patch I
> find when I click on the above link? Some of the patches in this series
> match what I find on your jenkins URLs, and some do not.
>
> For example, the function call in the body of the "if" below is
> "sysfs_remove_link()" but the function call in the "if" body of the code
> I find at http://review.whamcloud.com/14605 after clicking on the
> "lustre/lmv/lmv_obd.c" link is "lprocfs_remove_proc_entry()".
>
> Maybe I'm not using your jenkins correctly?
You are using it correctly.
The patch is a "port" from one tree to another, but the pointer is to
the original patch. As the trees have diverged, various differences have accumulated.
The pointer is still useful to better be able to see which patches were already
included and which were not yet.
Bye,
Oleg--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists