[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877fnrn1sj.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:24:28 +0300
From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
vince@...ter.net, eranian@...gle.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v3 1/6] exterr: Introduce extended syscall error reporting
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> writes:
> On Tue, 2015-09-15 at 17:15 +0300, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
>>
>> > It seems to me that current->ext_err_code needs to be cleared on
>> > each system call entry (except for your special prctl() of
>> > course!).
>>
>> I'd say, it should be up to the program to decide for how long they
>> want to keep the extended error code around.
>>
>
> I'm not convinced that works - imagine a library wanting to use the
> prctl(), but the main application isn't doing that. Should the library
> clear it before every call, to be sure it's not getting stale data?
> etc.
In other words, a syscall that's capable of throwing an extended error
does clear the current::ext_err_code every time, but not other
syscalls. Otherwise it will indeed get very confusing.
Regards,
--
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists