[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150915160046.GA14393@t440s.lenovo>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 00:00:46 +0800
From: Minfei Huang <mnfhuang@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Minfei Huang <mhuang@...hat.com>, mingo@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REPOST PATCH] ftrace: Remove the unused variant
ftrace_update_time
On 09/15/15 at 11:50am, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Sep 2015 23:37:39 +0800
> Minfei Huang <mnfhuang@...il.com> wrote:
>
>
> > I think the variant ftrace_update_time is not used any more. Previously,
> > it is used to print the time how long ftrace will spend to update the
> > code in fucntion ftraced.
>
> Yes, I know what it measures. It's been on my todo list to export that
> out to userspace, as it is an interesting metric.
>
Export the time which ftrace spent to update the all of the function?
How about exporting the time ftrace spent in latest time?
Thanks
Minfei
> >
> > >
> > > Maybe add it to the dyn_ftrace_total_info file?
> > >
> >
> > This file only uses the variant ftrace_update_tot_cnt which is stored
> > the updated function number.
>
> But we can add to that file with a space delimited output.
>
> -- Steve
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists