[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150915161855.GE10399@birch.djwong.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 09:18:55 -0700
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To: device-mapper development <dm-devel@...hat.com>
Cc: Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>, Neil Brown <neilb@...e.com>,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH] dm: ioctl: prevent double freeing
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 04:52:39PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> DM_PARAMS_KMALLOC and DM_PARAMS_VMALLOC should never be set together in
> param_flags. We are setting these flags while allocating so we know that
> there is almost no chance of having these two set together but still we
> can have some additional safety.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@...torindia.org>
> ---
> drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c b/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c
> index 80a4395..aaad74e 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-ioctl.c
> @@ -1680,7 +1680,7 @@ static void free_params(struct dm_ioctl *param, size_t param_size, int param_fla
>
> if (param_flags & DM_PARAMS_KMALLOC)
> kfree(param);
> - if (param_flags & DM_PARAMS_VMALLOC)
> + else if (param_flags & DM_PARAMS_VMALLOC)
Wouldn't you also want a WARN_ON to complain about both flags being set?
--D
> vfree(param);
> }
>
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> --
> dm-devel mailing list
> dm-devel@...hat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/dm-devel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists