linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kbuild: llvmlinux: Set appropriate compiler-flag for CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 14 Sep 2015 22:29:14 -0600
From:	Behan Webster <behanw@...verseincode.com>
To:	sedat.dilek@...il.com
Cc:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: llvmlinux: Set appropriate compiler-flag for
 CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE

On 09/14/15 22:07, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Behan Webster
> <behanw@...verseincode.com> wrote:
>> I haven't upstreamed this patch yet because we are still characterizing its
>> effects on other architectures.
> Then embed this information into the changelog of *your* patch.
It's in our tree/build system, as a work in progress. Which is why I 
haven't upstreamed it yet.

> So what is *your* solution in case of CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y
> (OptLevel '-Os' is wrong, '-Oz' is correct)?
I don't have one yet, which is precisely why I haven't upstreamed it yet.

Sedat, why don't you try working with us instead of making demands and 
accusing people?

Behan

-- 
Behan Webster
behanw@...verseincode.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/