[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150915165250.GC1747@two.firstfloor.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 18:52:50 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Junichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"andi@...stfloor.org" <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"fengguang.wu@...el.com" <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"david@...morbit.com" <david@...morbit.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] fs: global sync to not clear error status of
individual inodes
> Is this an actual problem? Write errors usually indicate that the
There are transaction systems that need to track errors at the level
of the individual IO. So yes we should guarantee that if a particular
sync failed an error is always returned.
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists