linux-kernel - [PATCH] PCI: Fix devfn for VPD access through function 0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150915171216.7049.58119.stgit@gimli.home>
Date:	Tue, 15 Sep 2015 11:17:21 -0600
From:	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To:	bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	mark.d.rustad@...el.com, myron.stowe@...hat.com,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] PCI: Fix devfn for VPD access through function 0

Commit 932c435caba8 ("PCI: Add dev_flags bit to access VPD through
function 0") passes PCI_SLOT(devfn) for the devfn parameter of
pci_get_slot().  Generally this works because we're fairly well
guaranteed that a PCIe device is at slot address 0, but for the
general case, including conventional PCI, it's incorrect.  We need
to get the slot and then convert it back into a devfn.

Fixes: 932c435caba8 ("PCI: Add dev_flags bit to access VPD through function 0")
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
---

Since the original patch and quirk was marked for stable and applies
to all Intel NICs, regardless of the bus type, I assume this needs to
chase it or VPD might disappear on e1000/e100 if it currently exists.

 drivers/pci/access.c |    9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/access.c b/drivers/pci/access.c
index 769f7e3..5a5f0a7 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/access.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/access.c
@@ -442,7 +442,8 @@ static const struct pci_vpd_ops pci_vpd_pci22_ops = {
 static ssize_t pci_vpd_f0_read(struct pci_dev *dev, loff_t pos, size_t count,
 			       void *arg)
 {
-	struct pci_dev *tdev = pci_get_slot(dev->bus, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn));
+	struct pci_dev *tdev = pci_get_slot(dev->bus,
+					    PCI_DEVFN(PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 0));
 	ssize_t ret;
 
 	if (!tdev)
@@ -456,7 +457,8 @@ static ssize_t pci_vpd_f0_read(struct pci_dev *dev, loff_t pos, size_t count,
 static ssize_t pci_vpd_f0_write(struct pci_dev *dev, loff_t pos, size_t count,
 				const void *arg)
 {
-	struct pci_dev *tdev = pci_get_slot(dev->bus, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn));
+	struct pci_dev *tdev = pci_get_slot(dev->bus,
+					    PCI_DEVFN(PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 0));
 	ssize_t ret;
 
 	if (!tdev)
@@ -475,7 +477,8 @@ static const struct pci_vpd_ops pci_vpd_f0_ops = {
 
 static int pci_vpd_f0_dev_check(struct pci_dev *dev)
 {
-	struct pci_dev *tdev = pci_get_slot(dev->bus, PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn));
+	struct pci_dev *tdev = pci_get_slot(dev->bus,
+					    PCI_DEVFN(PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn), 0));
 	int ret = 0;
 
 	if (!tdev)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/