[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVxhNvmEdMq0XRy1YZ+oJLDwcmE1y6prs7FGGhsS-Y5gg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 11:13:51 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
To: Tycho Andersen <tycho.andersen@...onical.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@...ntu.com>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: Re: v2 of seccomp filter c/r patches
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Tycho Andersen
<tycho.andersen@...onical.com> wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 10:52:46AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>>
>> I'm not sure I entirely like this solution...
>
> Ok. Since we also aren't going to do all the eBPF stuff now, how about
> something that looks like this:
>
> struct seccomp_layer {
> unsigned int size;
> unsigned int type; /* SECCOMP_BPF_CLASSIC or SECCOMP_EBPF or ... */
> bool inherited;
> union {
> unsigned int insn_cnt;
> struct bpf_insn *insns;
> };
> };
>
> with a ptrace command:
>
> ptrace(PTRACE_SECCOMP_DUMP_LAYER, pid, i, &layer);
>
> If we save a pointer to the current seccomp filter on fork (if there
> is one), then I think the inherited flag is just,
>
> inherited = is_ancestor(child->seccomp.filter, child->seccomp.inherited_filter)
>
I'm lost. What is the inherited flag for?
--Andy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists