[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150915182755.GA31484@htj.duckdns.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:27:55 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Lee Duncan <lduncan@...e.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@...e.de>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/17] Add ida and idr helper routines.
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:46:01AM -0700, Lee Duncan wrote:
> +/**
> + * ida_get_index - allocate a ida index value
> + * @ida idr handle
> + * @lock spinlock handle protecting this index
> + * @p_id pointer to allocated index value
> + *
> + * A helper function for safely allocating an index value (id),
> + * returning a negative errno value on failure, else 0.
> + */
> +static inline int ida_get_index(struct ida *ida, spinlock_t *lock, int *p_id)
> +{
> + int error = -ENOMEM;
> +
> + do {
> + if (!ida_pre_get(ida, GFP_KERNEL))
> + break;
> + spin_lock(lock);
> + error = ida_get_new(ida, p_id);
> + spin_unlock(lock);
> + } while (error == -EAGAIN);
> +
> + return error;
> +}
Obviously ida allocation doesn't need to be synchronized against
anything else. Why not just use ida_simple_get/remove()?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists