[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3059739.5oJNmvzYWC@wuerfel>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 10:40:26 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...all.nl>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
y2038@...ts.linaro.org,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] [RFC] [media]: v4l2: introduce v4l2_timeval
On Wednesday 16 September 2015 10:12:00 Hans Verkuil wrote:
>
> Are you also attending the ELCE in Dublin? We could have a quick talk there.
> I think the discussion whether to switch to a new v4l2_buffer struct isn't really
> dependent on anything y2038.
No, unfortunately I won't be there.
Concerning a v4l2_buffer, I agree we should treat that as a completely independent
topic. The problem at hand for y2038 is only about we expect to happen when someone
compiles source code that uses the existing v4l2_buffer (and v4l2_event) with a
y2038-aware libc.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists