[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55F92F04.1040706@de.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 10:57:40 +0200
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org >> Linux Kernel Mailing List"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [4.2] commit d59cfc09c32 (sched, cgroup: replace
signal_struct->group_rwsem with a global percpu_rwsem) causes regression for
libvirt/kvm
Am 16.09.2015 um 10:32 schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>
>
> On 15/09/2015 19:38, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>> Excellent points!
>>
>> Other options in such situations include the following:
>>
>> o Rework so that the code uses call_rcu*() instead of *_expedited().
>>
>> o Maintain a per-task or per-CPU counter so that every so many
>> *_expedited() invocations instead uses the non-expedited
>> counterpart. (For example, synchronize_rcu instead of
>> synchronize_rcu_expedited().)
>
> Or just use ratelimit (untested):
One of my tests was to always replace synchronize_sched_expedited with
synchronize_sched and things turned out to be even worse. Not sure if
it makes sense to test yopur in-the-middle approach?
Christian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists