linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/3] mm/oom_kill: introduce is_sysrq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1442404800-4051-2-git-send-email-bywxiaobai@163.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Sep 2015 19:59:59 +0800
From:	Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@....com>
To:	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mgorman@...e.de, mhocko@...nel.org,
	rientjes@...gle.com, hannes@...xchg.org, vdavydov@...allels.com,
	oleg@...hat.com, vbabka@...e.cz, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
	zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] mm/oom_kill: introduce is_sysrq_oom helper

Introduce is_sysrq_oom helper function indicating oom kill triggered
by sysrq to improve readability.

No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Yaowei Bai <bywxiaobai@....com>
---
 mm/oom_kill.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 1ecc0bc..7b6228e 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -118,6 +118,15 @@ found:
 	return t;
 }
 
+/*
+ * order == -1 means the oom kill is required by sysrq, otherwise only
+ * for display purposes.
+ */
+static inline bool is_sysrq_oom(struct oom_control *oc)
+{
+	return oc->order == -1;
+}
+
 /* return true if the task is not adequate as candidate victim task. */
 static bool oom_unkillable_task(struct task_struct *p,
 		struct mem_cgroup *memcg, const nodemask_t *nodemask)
@@ -265,7 +274,7 @@ enum oom_scan_t oom_scan_process_thread(struct oom_control *oc,
 	 * Don't allow any other task to have access to the reserves.
 	 */
 	if (test_tsk_thread_flag(task, TIF_MEMDIE)) {
-		if (oc->order != -1)
+		if (!is_sysrq_oom(oc))
 			return OOM_SCAN_ABORT;
 	}
 	if (!task->mm)
@@ -278,7 +287,7 @@ enum oom_scan_t oom_scan_process_thread(struct oom_control *oc,
 	if (oom_task_origin(task))
 		return OOM_SCAN_SELECT;
 
-	if (task_will_free_mem(task) && oc->order != -1)
+	if (task_will_free_mem(task) && !is_sysrq_oom(oc))
 		return OOM_SCAN_ABORT;
 
 	return OOM_SCAN_OK;
@@ -608,7 +617,7 @@ void check_panic_on_oom(struct oom_control *oc, enum oom_constraint constraint,
 			return;
 	}
 	/* Do not panic for oom kills triggered by sysrq */
-	if (oc->order == -1)
+	if (is_sysrq_oom(oc))
 		return;
 	dump_header(oc, NULL, memcg);
 	panic("Out of memory: %s panic_on_oom is enabled\n",
@@ -688,7 +697,7 @@ bool out_of_memory(struct oom_control *oc)
 
 	p = select_bad_process(oc, &points, totalpages);
 	/* Found nothing?!?! Either we hang forever, or we panic. */
-	if (!p && oc->order != -1) {
+	if (!p && !is_sysrq_oom(oc)) {
 		dump_header(oc, NULL, NULL);
 		panic("Out of memory and no killable processes...\n");
 	}
-- 
1.9.1


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/