[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3396868.gayp4sQhTl@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 03:30:13 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@...ux.intel.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: pass policy to ->get() driver callback
On Tuesday, September 15, 2015 01:09:21 PM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 11-09-15, 21:48, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > -/* Only for cpufreq core internal use */
> > > struct cpufreq_policy *cpufreq_cpu_get_raw(unsigned int cpu)
> > > {
> > > struct cpufreq_policy *policy = per_cpu(cpufreq_cpu_data, cpu);
> > >
> > > return policy && cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, policy->cpus) ? policy : NULL;
> > > }
> > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_cpu_get_raw);
>
> This routine was recently marked as static and now with your patch it
> results in compilation error. You just need to remove the 'static'
> part from the routine.
>
> I would have sent a patch for this, but I thought you would like to
> edit the original patch itself to not break git bisect.
I even tried to do that previously, but I made a mistake then.
It should be fixed in my bleeding-edge branch now.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists