[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150917011021.0460792d@xhacker>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 01:10:21 +0800
From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: <jason@...edaemon.net>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<marc.zyngier@....com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression by 01f779f4862b ("irqchip/GIC: Don't deactivate
interrupts forwarded to a guest")
Dear Thomas,
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:59:08 +0800
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Sep 2015 18:52:41 +0200
> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 17 Sep 2015, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Marc,
> > >
> > > Commit 01f779f4862b ("irqchip/GIC: Don't deactivate interrupts forwarded to a
> > > guest") causes a regression on Marvell BG4CT SoC. In this SoC, there's only one
> > > GIC, the secondary irq controller is Synopsys DW iCtl:
> > > drivers/irqchip/irq-dw-apb-ictl.c
> > >
> > > So cascading_gic_irq() should return true on Marvell BG4CT SoC, but it returns
> > > false. The logic in cascading_gic_irq() doesn't take cascaded irq controller
> > > which is provided by non-gic controllers.
> >
> > I have a fix pending for this in
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git tmp.irq
> >
> > 714665351cc7: irqchip/gic: Use IRQD_FORWARDED_TO_VCPU flag
> >
> > Can you please give that a try?
>
> Sure, Will try and get back to you
Good news! The regression is fixed, cascaded irq works again!
Feel free to add
Tested-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...vell.com>
Thanks lot for this patch,
Jisheng
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists