linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] PCI: generic: Correct, and avoid overflow, in bus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 16 Sep 2015 10:39:23 -0700
From:	David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC:	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
	David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
	"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	David Daney <david.daney@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] PCI: generic: Correct, and avoid overflow, in bus_max
 calculation.

On 09/16/2015 10:29 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Lorenzo,
>
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:28:52PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:41:53AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
>>>> Here is the current code:
>>>>
>>>>>> 	bus_range = pci->cfg.bus_range;
>>>>>> 	for (busn = bus_range->start; busn <= bus_range->end; ++busn) {
>>>>>> 		u32 idx = busn - bus_range->start;
>>>>
>>>> The index is offset by the bus range start...
>>>>
>>>>>> 		u32 sz = 1 << pci->cfg.ops.bus_shift;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 		pci->cfg.win[idx] = devm_ioremap(dev,
>>>>>> 						 pci->cfg.res.start + busn * sz,
>>>>>> 						 sz);
>>>>
>>>> But, the offset into the "reg" property is the raw bus number.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>> 		if (!pci->cfg.win[idx])
>>>>>> 			return -ENOMEM;
>>>>>> 	}
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I hope that makes it more clear.
>>>
>>> Got it. So we should be using idx instead of busn in the devm_ioremap
>>> call above.
>>
>> I think that's not what's specified in the PCI firmware specification,
>> at least for the MMCFG regions. For MMCFG regions (quoting the specs)
>> the "base address of the memory mapped configuration space always
>> corresponds to bus number 0 (regardless of the start bus number decoded
>> by the host bridge)..."
>>
>> For the x86 implementation have a look at:
>>
>> arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_64.c mcfg_ioremap()
>>
>> static void __iomem *mcfg_ioremap(struct pci_mmcfg_region *cfg)
>> {
>> 	void __iomem *addr;
>> 	u64 start, size;
>> 	int num_buses;
>>
>> 	start = cfg->address + PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(cfg->start_bus);
>> 	num_buses = cfg->end_bus - cfg->start_bus + 1;
>> 	size = PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(num_buses);
>> 	addr = ioremap_nocache(start, size);
>> 	if (addr)
>> 		addr -= PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(cfg->start_bus);
>> 	return addr;
>> }
>>
>> The MCFG config accessors add back the PCI_MMCFG_BUS_OFFSET(cfg->start_bus)
>> to the virtual address so that the proper virtual address is used when
>> issuing the config cycles, that's my understanding.
>
> Ok. I think that whether the config space mapping or the config accessors
> do the fixup should remain an implementation detail, but the resource
> identifying config space should be dealt with consistently.
>
> So that means the reg property should describe everything from bus 0,
> but then we only map the region corresponding to the bus-range.
>
>> So IMO we have to define what "reg" represents for ECAM in DT, we can't
>> leave this open to interpretation (and I think makng MCFG and DT config
>> work the same way would be ideal).

I will update the 
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/host-generic-pci.txt to reflect 
this interpretation.

>
> If we define reg to cover the whole config space from bus 0 onwards,
> then I think the driver should work as-is today. It's slightly odd, in
> that there may be a prefix of config space that maps to god-knows-where,
> but it's consistent with ACPI and doesn't require us to change the driver.
>
> David?

I agree with this approach for two reasons:

1) My interpretation of relevant specifications agrees with Lorenzo's

2) It is less work for me, as this is how my firmware is currently 
configured.

This patch 4/6 is still necessary, as the bus_max calculation is broken 
for non-zero start_bus.

I anticipate sending a new version of the patch set later today (PDT). 
I will add any Acked-by/Reviewed-by that I receive to the new set.

David Daney


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/