[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1442436811-23382-3-git-send-email-Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 15:53:30 -0500
From: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@....com>
To: <bp@...en8.de>, <mchehab@....samsung.com>,
<dougthompson@...ssion.com>
CC: <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/3] EDAC, amd64_edac: Extend scrub rate programmability feature for F15hM60h
For F15h M60h processor, the scrub rate control register has moved
to F2 of PCI config space and is at a different offset from
earlier processors. The minimun recommended scrub rate is also different.
(Refer D18F2x1c8_dct[1:0][DramScrub] on Fam15hM60h BKDG)
Modify the set_scrub_rate() and get_scrub_rate() functions so that
they are aware of these changes.
Fixing couple of indentation issues since I am touching the file.
Tested on F15hM60h, Fam15h Models 00h-0fh and Fam10h systems and
it works fine.
Signed-off-by: Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@....com>
---
drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
index 73aea40..1ec4a13 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.c
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static inline int amd64_read_dct_pci_cfg(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 dct,
* scan the scrub rate mapping table for a close or matching bandwidth value to
* issue. If requested is too big, then use last maximum value found.
*/
-static int __set_scrub_rate(struct pci_dev *ctl, u32 new_bw, u32 min_rate)
+static u32 find_scrub_rate(u32 new_bw, u32 min_rate, u32 *scrub_bw)
{
u32 scrubval;
int i;
@@ -200,28 +200,52 @@ static int __set_scrub_rate(struct pci_dev *ctl, u32 new_bw, u32 min_rate)
}
scrubval = scrubrates[i].scrubval;
+ *scrub_bw = scrubval ? scrubrates[i].bandwidth : 0;
- pci_write_bits32(ctl, SCRCTRL, scrubval, 0x001F);
+ return scrubval;
+}
- if (scrubval)
- return scrubrates[i].bandwidth;
+static inline void __set_scrub_rate(struct pci_dev *ctl, int offset,
+ u32 scrubval)
+{
+ pci_write_bits32(ctl, offset, scrubval, SCRMASK);
- return 0;
}
static int set_scrub_rate(struct mem_ctl_info *mci, u32 bw)
{
struct amd64_pvt *pvt = mci->pvt_info;
u32 min_scrubrate = 0x5;
+ u32 scrubrate, scrub_bw;
if (pvt->fam == 0xf)
min_scrubrate = 0x0;
+ else if (pvt->fam == 0x15 && pvt->model == 0x60)
+ min_scrubrate = 0x6;
/* Erratum #505 */
if (pvt->fam == 0x15 && pvt->model < 0x10)
f15h_select_dct(pvt, 0);
- return __set_scrub_rate(pvt->F3, bw, min_scrubrate);
+ scrubrate = find_scrub_rate(bw, min_scrubrate, &scrub_bw);
+
+ /* Scrub rate control register moved to F2 register space for
+ * F15hM60h andit is per DCT now. So, need to select the DCT
+ * using DCT_CFG_SEL first and then program the scrubrate
+ */
+ if (pvt->fam == 0x15 && pvt->model == 0x60) {
+ f15h_select_dct(pvt, 0);
+ __set_scrub_rate(pvt->F2, F15H_M60H_SCRCTRL, scrubrate);
+ f15h_select_dct(pvt, 1);
+ __set_scrub_rate(pvt->F2, F15H_M60H_SCRCTRL, scrubrate);
+
+ goto scrub_out;
+ }
+
+ __set_scrub_rate(pvt->F3, SCRCTRL, scrubrate);
+
+scrub_out:
+ return scrub_bw;
}
static int get_scrub_rate(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
@@ -234,9 +258,18 @@ static int get_scrub_rate(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
if (pvt->fam == 0x15 && pvt->model < 0x10)
f15h_select_dct(pvt, 0);
- amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F3, SCRCTRL, &scrubval);
+ if (pvt->fam == 0x15 && pvt->model == 0x60) {
+ /* Since we mirror the same scrubrate value across
+ * both DCTs, it is enough to read the value off one of
+ * the DCT registers.
+ */
+ f15h_select_dct(pvt, 0);
+ amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F2, F15H_M60H_SCRCTRL, &scrubval);
+ } else {
+ amd64_read_pci_cfg(pvt->F3, SCRCTRL, &scrubval);
+ }
- scrubval = scrubval & 0x001F;
+ scrubval = scrubval & SCRMASK;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(scrubrates); i++) {
if (scrubrates[i].scrubval == scrubval) {
@@ -1316,7 +1349,7 @@ static int f15_m60h_dbam_to_chip_select(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 dct,
* F16h and F15h model 30h have only limited cs_modes.
*/
static int f16_dbam_to_chip_select(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, u8 dct,
- unsigned cs_mode, int cs_mask_nr)
+ unsigned cs_mode, int cs_mask_nr)
{
WARN_ON(cs_mode > 12);
@@ -1666,7 +1699,7 @@ static int f1x_match_to_this_node(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, unsigned range,
}
static int f15_m30h_match_to_this_node(struct amd64_pvt *pvt, unsigned range,
- u64 sys_addr, int *chan_sel)
+ u64 sys_addr, int *chan_sel)
{
int cs_found = -EINVAL;
int num_dcts_intlv = 0;
diff --git a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
index 4bdec75..15c0eb4 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
+++ b/drivers/edac/amd64_edac.h
@@ -255,6 +255,8 @@
#define DCT_SEL_HI 0x114
+#define F15H_M60H_SCRCTRL 0x1C8
+
/*
* Function 3 - Misc Control
*/
@@ -269,6 +271,7 @@
#define NBSL_PP_OBS 0x2
#define SCRCTRL 0x58
+#define SCRMASK 0x1F
#define F10_ONLINE_SPARE 0xB0
#define online_spare_swap_done(pvt, c) (((pvt)->online_spare >> (1 + 2 * (c))) & 0x1)
--
2.5.0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists