linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] genirq: Fix bad IRQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1509170958580.3951@nanos>
Date:	Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:59:42 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Kohji Okuno <okuno.kohji@...panasonic.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: Fix bad IRQ_ONSHOT in forced IRQ setting

On Thu, 17 Sep 2015, Kohji Okuno wrote:
> If handler and thread_fn have valid function pointers for each
> in request_thread_irq(), IRQF_ONESHOT is set unnecessarily in
> irq_setup_forces_threading() in case of threadirqs.
> As this result, the IRQ handler will not be called.

That explanation does not make sense. Which handler is not called?

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/