[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150917093914.GA18723@hori1.linux.bs1.fc.nec.co.jp>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 09:39:15 +0000
From: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
To: Pádraig Brady <P@...igBrady.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Jörn Engel <joern@...estorage.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Naoya Horiguchi <nao.horiguchi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] mm: hugetlb: proc: add HugetlbPages field to
/proc/PID/smaps
On Mon, Sep 07, 2015 at 11:52:41AM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
...
>
> By the same argument I presume the existing THP "AnonHugePages" smaps field
> is not accounted for in the {Private,Shared}_... fields?
> I.E. AnonHugePages may also benefit from splitting to Private/Shared?
smaps_pmd_entry() not only increments mss->anonymous_thp, but also calls
smaps_account() which updates mss->anonymous, mss->referenced and
mss->{shared,private}_{clean,dirty}, so thp's shared/private characteristic
is included in other existing fields.
I think that even if we know the thp-specific shared/private profiles, it
might be hard to do something beneficial using that information, so I feel
keeping this field as-is is ok for now.
Thanks,
Naoya Horiguchi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists