[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+MoWDraY5XjJu7V+LL4L4OgovyNPEJiuvzZb2C-xZtF8UEUnw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:58:54 +0200
From: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@...il.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: benh@...nel.crashing.org, paulus@...ba.org, anton@...ba.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch-powerpc: Return false instead of -EFAULT
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:47 AM, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 11:18 +0200, Peter Senna Tschudin wrote:
>> Returning a negative value for a boolean function seem to have the
>> undesired effect of returning true. Replace -EINVAL by false in a
>> bool-returning function.
>>
>> The diff of the .s file before and after the change (using cross
>> compilation) starts with:
>>
>> 440,441c440,441
>> < .L43:
>> < li 3,1 # D.25775,
>> ---
>> > .L42:
>> > li 3,0 # D.25775,
>> ...
>>
>> while if -EFAULT is replaced by true, the diff is empty.
>
> Ah, that's rather unfortunate.
>
> Can you post the full asm listing, for all three cases?
Sure, but it would be 3 files of 70kb each. You can download them form:
http://petersenna.com/files/module_64.s.tar.xz
Let me know if this download method doesn't work for you.
module_64.s: Original file.
module_64-patched.s: With my patch
module_64-true.s: Changing -EFAULT by true
files were made with:
$ make arch/powerpc/kernel/module_64.s
using:
gcc-powerpc64-linux-gnu-4.9.2-5.fc21.x86_64
>
> cheers
>
>
--
Peter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists