[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150917125155.GA16085@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 05:51:55 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.com>,
Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hans Boehm <hboehm@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tty: fix data race in tty_buffer_flush
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 12:28:11PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> One stupid question. There is a number of branches:
> remotes/origin/master
> remotes/origin/tty-linus
> remotes/origin/tty-next
> remotes/origin/tty-testing
>
> What branch should I base my patches on? I used master.
Right now, if you look, they all point to the same thing, so it doesn't
matter :)
tty-linus is for patches to go to Linus this kernel release.
tty-next is for patches to go to Linus the next kernel release.
Both tty-linus and tty-next show up in linux-next and are never rebased.
tty-testing is for patches that are being considered for tty-next, it
does not show up in linux-next and sometimes is rebased if things go
wrong with the patches.
Hope this helps,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists