linux-kernel - Re: DEFINE_IDA causing memory leaks? (was Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio: fix memory leak of virtio ida cache layers)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Sep 2015 07:15:44 -0700
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc:	Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, open-iscsi@...glegroups.com,
	Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
Subject: Re: DEFINE_IDA causing memory leaks? (was  Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio:
 fix memory leak of virtio ida cache layers)

On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 08:33 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 07:29:17PM -0500, Suman Anna wrote:
> > The virtio core uses a static ida named virtio_index_ida for
> > assigning index numbers to virtio devices during registration.
> > The ida core may allocate some internal idr cache layers and
> > an ida bitmap upon any ida allocation, and all these layers are
> > truely freed only upon the ida destruction. The virtio_index_ida
> > is not destroyed at present, leading to a memory leak when using
> > the virtio core as a module and atleast one virtio device is
> > registered and unregistered.
> > 
> > Fix this by invoking ida_destroy() in the virtio core module
> > exit.
> > 
> > Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
> 
> Interesting.
> Will the same apply to e.g. sd_index_ida in drivers/scsi/sd.c
> or iscsi_sess_ida in drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_iscsi.c?
> 
> If no, why not?
> 
> One doesn't generally expect to have to free global variables.
> Maybe we should forbid DEFINE_IDA in modules?
> 
> James, could you comment on this please?

ida is Tejun's baby (cc'd).  However, it does look like without
ida_destroy() you will leave a cached ida->bitmap dangling because we're
trying to be a bit clever in ida_remove() so we cache the bitmap to
relieve ida_pre_get() of the burden if we would otherwise free it.

I don't understand why you'd want to forbid DEFINE_IDA ... all it does
is pre-initialise a usually static ida structure.  The initialised
structure will have a NULL bitmap cache that's allocated in the first
ida_pre_get() ... that all seems to work as expected and no different
from a dynamically allocated struct ida.  Or are you thinking because
ida_destory() doesn't set bitmap to NULL, it damages the reuse?  In
which case I'm not sure there's much benefit to making it reusable, but
I suppose we could by adding a memset into ida_destroy().

James

> > ---
> >  drivers/virtio/virtio.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > index b1877d73fa56..7062bb0975a5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio.c
> > @@ -412,6 +412,7 @@ static int virtio_init(void)
> >  static void __exit virtio_exit(void)
> >  {
> >  	bus_unregister(&virtio_bus);
> > +	ida_destroy(&virtio_index_ida);
> >  }
> >  core_initcall(virtio_init);
> >  module_exit(virtio_exit);
> > -- 
> > 2.5.0
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/