[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150917153743.GN3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:37:43 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: lizefan@...wei.com, hannes@...xchg.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] jump_label: make static_key_enabled() work on
static_key_true/false types too
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:27:52AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:59:57AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 09:51:22PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > static_key_enabled() can be used on struct static_key but not on its
> > > wrapper types static_key_true and static_key_false. The function is
> > > useful for debugging and management of static keys. Update it so that
> > > it can be used for the wrapper types too.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > > ---
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > If this patch is acceptable, please let me know how it should be
> > > routed.
> > >
> >
> > Yeah, no problem with this, I'm assuming there's dependencies in the
> > patches you didn't send me?
>
> Yeap, later patches add static_keys for testing whether a controller
> is enabled and whether it's on the new or old hierarchy and management
> path in cgroup core needs to index the keys and test them.
Ok, take it through you tree then, its a small enough patch.
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists