[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150917155332.GP3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:53:32 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, lizefan@...wei.com,
cgroups <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@...com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: Implement interface for cgroup unified
hierarchy
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 11:52:45AM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 05:10:49PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Subject: sched: Refuse to unplug a CPU if this will violate user task affinity
> >
> > Its bad policy to allow unplugging a CPU for which a user set explicit
> > affinity, either strictly on this CPU or in case this was the last
> > online CPU in its mask.
> >
> > Either would end up forcing the thread on a random other CPU, violating
> > the sys_sched_setaffinity() constraint.
>
> Shouldn't this at least handle suspend differently? Otherwise any
> userland task would be able to block suspend.
It does, it will allow suspend.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists