[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150917164108.GF12808@leverpostej>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 17:41:09 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <Sudeep.Holla@....com>,
James Liao <jamesjj.liao@...iatek.com>,
"srv_heupstream@...iatek.com" <srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Eddie Huang <eddie.huang@...iatek.com>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] arm64: dts: mt8173: add timer node
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 03:56:56PM +0100, Yingjoe Chen wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-17 at 14:51 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> >
> > On 16/09/15 03:04, Yingjoe Chen wrote:
> > > From: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@...omium.org>
> > >
> > > Add device node to enable GPT timer. This timer will be
> > > used as sched clock source.
> > >
> >
> > Interesting any known issues with or advantage over the arch timers
> > to prefer it as sched clock source. I see even arch timers are present
> > in DT, hence the question. Or is it just a incorrect commit log ?
> >
> > How does this get selected as sched clock source ? I don't see
> > sched_clock_register in mtk_timer.c
> >
> > To be clear, I am not against adding this timer support, but just want
> > to know is it preferred for sched clock source ? if yes why ? better
> > resolution ?
>
> Hi Sudeep,
>
> Thanks for your review.
>
> I hit the send too soon and missed cover letter, please see:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-mediatek/2015-September/002303.html
>
> The main reason to use GPT as sched clock is it won't stop during idle.
You don't mean sched clock, you just mean a clock_event_device.
A sched_clock is a high-precision clocksource that is read from (which
by definition requires the CPUs to be non-idle). It doesn't have
anything to do with interrupts and therefore cannot wake devices from
idle.
While the clock_event_device for the generic timer can't necessarily
wake CPUs from idle. The generic timer system counter counts even if
CPUs are idle, so the generic timer is fine as a sched_clock.
Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists