[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871tdxrn6r.fsf@belgarion.home>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 19:05:32 +0200
From: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Petr Cvek <petr.cvek@....cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mmc: pxamci: fix card detect with slot-gpio API
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> writes:
>> + if (gpio_is_valid(gpio_ro))
>> + ret = mmc_gpio_request_ro(mmc, gpio_ro);
>
> Would it be possible for you to use the mmc_gpiod_request_ro() instead?
I don't think so.
Most of pxamci users are old platform data based machine code, which passes an
integer for the gpio. A full conversion to gpio_desc is another work.
>> - gpio_direction_input(gpio_cd);
>>
>> - ret = request_irq(gpio_to_irq(gpio_cd), pxamci_detect_irq,
>
> I guess the pxamci_detect_irq() function can be removed within this
> patch as well!?
Euh no. The reason is on this line :
host->pdata->init(&pdev->dev, pxamci_detect_irq, mmc);
Machine code is passed this callback to signal a card detection change for
esoteric cases, using this function as a IRQ handler. For example we have
trizeps4_mci_init() in arch/arm/mach-pxa/trizeps4.c.
>> + if (gpio_is_valid(gpio_cd))
>> + ret = mmc_gpio_request_cd(mmc, gpio_cd, 0);
>
> Would it be possible for you to use the mmc_gpiod_request_cd() instead?
Same reason as before I'm afraid.
> I believe you have some additional code to remove in pxamci_remove().
> Some gpio_free() and free_irq() shouldn't be needed there after this
> change.
Yes, good catch. This will be for v3.
Cheers.
--
Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists