[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150917171529.GA15447@htj.duckdns.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 13:15:29 -0400
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>,
Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@...ery.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, open-iscsi@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: DEFINE_IDA causing memory leaks? (was Re: [PATCH 1/2] virtio:
fix memory leak of virtio ida cache layers)
Hello,
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 09:48:37AM -0700, James Bottomley wrote:
> Well, there's an easy fix for that. We could have ida_remove() actually
> free the bitmap and not cache it if it's the last layer. That way ida
> would naturally empty and we wouldn't need a destructor. Tejun, would
> that work?
Yeah, that definitely is one way to go about it. It kinda muddles the
purpose of ida_destroy() tho. I suppose we can rename it to
idr_remove_all() and then do the same to idr. I'm not particularly
objecting to all that but what's wrong with just calling idr_destroy()
on exit paths? If missing the call in modules is an issue, maybe we
can just annotate idr/ida with debugobj?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists