[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1442512783-14719-1-git-send-email-kwalker@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 13:59:43 -0400
From: Kyle Walker <kwalker@...hat.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: mhocko@...e.cz, rientjes@...gle.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
vdavydov@...allels.com, oleg@...hat.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Kyle Walker <kwalker@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] mm/oom_kill.c: don't kill TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE tasks
Currently, the oom killer will attempt to kill a process that is in
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE state. For tasks in this state for an exceptional
period of time, such as processes writing to a frozen filesystem during
a lengthy backup operation, this can result in a deadlock condition as
related processes memory access will stall within the page fault
handler.
Within oom_unkillable_task(), check for processes in
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE (TASK_KILLABLE omitted). The oom killer will
move on to another task.
Signed-off-by: Kyle Walker <kwalker@...hat.com>
---
mm/oom_kill.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index 1ecc0bc..66f03f8 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -131,6 +131,10 @@ static bool oom_unkillable_task(struct task_struct *p,
if (memcg && !task_in_mem_cgroup(p, memcg))
return true;
+ /* Uninterruptible tasks should not be killed unless in TASK_WAKEKILL */
+ if (p->state == TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
+ return true;
+
/* p may not have freeable memory in nodemask */
if (!has_intersects_mems_allowed(p, nodemask))
return true;
--
2.4.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists