linux-kernel - Re: Failover root devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 17 Sep 2015 14:05:26 -0400
From:	Drew DeVault <sir@...wn.com>
To:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
	Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
Cc:	Ortwin Glück <odi@....ch>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Failover root devices

> Better send a patch to dracut folks. :-)
> Major distros use it and if the feature is nice other initramfs implementations will adopt it too.

dracut is the common one sure, but I'm still not confident that it's the 
right place to put this. How would that feature look? Would we have the 
root= parameter use a format that's specific to dracut and no longer a 
sane kernel parameter? Would we use a second parameter and discard the 
root= parameter? I think all of these are suboptimal solutions. No, the 
right way, I think, is to implement this in the kernel and let the init 
systems take it from there themselves.

--
Drew DeVault
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/