[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE_Gge1cGbeV93bzF_1Vo9S-3QtxtASSD1Mzt_ULcPux41Aa-w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 01:06:33 -0400
From: Raphaƫl Beamonte <raphael.beamonte@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Cristina Opriceana <cristina.opriceana@...il.com>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 03/16] staging: rtl8192u: r8192U_core: add temporary
variables to keep lines under 80 characters
2015-09-17 0:57 GMT-04:00 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>:
<SNIP>
>> @@ -1748,8 +1755,9 @@ static short rtl8192_usb_initendpoints(struct net_device *dev)
>> oldaddr = priv->oldaddr;
>> align = ((long)oldaddr) & 3;
>> if (align) {
>> - newaddr = oldaddr + 4 - align;
>> - priv->rx_urb[16]->transfer_buffer_length = 16 - 4 + align;
>> + align = 4 - align;
>> + newaddr = oldaddr + align;
>> + priv->rx_urb[16]->transfer_buffer_length = 16 - align;
>
> At a quick glance, this conversion looks wrong...
What is wrong with it?
oldaddr + 4 - align;
can also be read:
oldaddr + (4 - align);
as well as
16 - 4 + align;
can also be read
16 - (4 - align);
as when we remove the parenthesis, the - sign invert the parenthesis
elements signs.
Calculating (4 - align) previously thus preserve the logic here!
> And it's not what your changelog text said you were doing :(
It's true that I didn't add a new temporary variable here but instead
re-used one that is not used after, but I thought it went in the same
idea as the rest of this patch. Should I separate that as another
patch?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists