[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFz6zfHQnrwtimgm9v10s8dkF-e1w1aQQ3aWperbZGT1Jg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 12:39:51 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs-writeback: drop wb->list_lock during blk_finish_plug()
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> wrote:
>>
>> Dave, if you're testing my current -git, the other performance issue
>> might still be the spinlock thing.
>
> I have the fix as the first commit in my local tree - it'll remain
> there until I get a conflict after an update. :)
Ok. I'm happy to report that you should get a conflict now, and that
the spinlock code should work well for your virtualized case again.
No updates on the plugging thing yet, I'll wait a bit and follow this
thread and see if somebody comes up with any explanations or theories
in the hope that we might not need to revert (or at least have a more
targeted change).
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists