linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] genirq: Fix bad IRQ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1509172251370.3951@nanos>
Date:	Thu, 17 Sep 2015 23:10:02 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Kohji Okuno <okuno.kohji@...panasonic.com>
cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: Fix bad IRQ_ONSHOT in forced IRQ setting

On Thu, 17 Sep 2015, Kohji Okuno wrote:
>
> When 1st sdio IRQ is happend, sdhci_irq() returns IRQ_WAKE_THREAD.
> After this, sdhci_irq() is not called in case of threadirqs.

What kind of system is that?

Can you provide the output of /proc/interrupts please?

I think your patch is fine. I just want to understand why we don't see
any more interrupts.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/