[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150917220944.GX21084@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 23:09:44 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 2/4] genirq: add move_irqs() for cpu hotplug
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:04:06AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Sep 2015, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > I don't think having this prototype guarded by this #if is very useful.
> > You can probably leave it standalone.
>
> Yes, there is no point if the function name is unique. Though
> move_irqs() is rather undescriptive. irq_break_affinities() might
> describe it quite well, but feel free to come up with soemthing better.
I don't think "irq_break_affinities" is anywhere near a good name - it's
not about always breaking affinities (moving an IRQ off one CPU onto
another within the current affinity setting does not break the affinity.)
irq_migrate_all()
irq_migrate_all_off_this_cpu()
irq_this_cpu_hotunplug()
irq_cpu_hotunplug()
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists