lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1509180015050.3951@nanos>
Date:	Fri, 18 Sep 2015 00:15:35 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
cc:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/03] irqchip: renesas-irqc: r8a7795 and generic chip
 update

On Thu, 17 Sep 2015, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Geert,
> 
> On Thursday 17 September 2015 10:31:59 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 9:57 AM, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au> wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 04:12:30PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> > >> irqchip: renesas-irqc: r8a7795 and generic chip update
> > >> 
> > >> [PATCH 01/03] irqchip: renesas-irqc: Add r8a7795 IRQC DT documentation
> > >> [PATCH 02/03] irqchip: renesas-irqc: Move over to generic chip
> > >> [PATCH 03/03] irqchip: renesas-irqc: Enable nested lock
> > >> 
> > >> This series updates the IRQC driver with generic chip support including
> > >> nested locking. Also the DT documentation is extended with r8a7795
> > >> support.
> > > 
> > > Its not entirely clear what the relationship is between these patches
> > > nor what the motivation is for the last two patches.
> > 
> > Patch 2 is a cleanup/consolidation.
> 
> In just a few lines, and just for my information, what does generic IRQ chip 
> offers compared to the current implementatoin ?

Common, i.e. less duplicated code.

Thanks,

	tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ