linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 15/16] clk: shmobile: mstp: Consider "zb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150917222454.GW23081@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Thu, 17 Sep 2015 15:24:54 -0700
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
Cc:	Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/16] clk: shmobile: mstp: Consider "zb_clk" suitable
 for power management

On 09/17, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 05:45:18PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > Hi Mike, Hi Stephen,
> > 
> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 02:28:16PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > Currently the CPG/MSTP Clock Domain code looks for MSTP clocks to power
> > > manage a device.
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately, on R-Mobile APE6 (r8a73a4) and SH-Mobile AG5 (sh73a0),
> > > the Bus State Controller (BSC) is not power-managed by an MSTP clock,
> > > but by a plain CPG clock (zb_clk).  Add a special case to handle this,
> > > so the clock is properly managed, and devices connected to the BSC work
> > > as expected.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> > > Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> > 
> > for one reason or another I seem to have this patch queued up in
> > my renesas tree for v4.4, without any Acks.
> > 
> > I think it would be best if one of you took the patch instead.
> > Though I'm also happy to take it with Acks.
> > 
> > Let me know how you would like to proceed.
> 
> Sorry to revise the above, I should have checked more closely
> before I sent my previous email. I now see that I have an SoC patch
> that depends on this one. So if possible I'd like to take this one
> through my tree with an Ack or two.
> 

Sure.

Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/