[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150918073615.GB2691@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:36:15 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] x86/math-emu: Remove define layer for undocumented
opcodes
* Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com> wrote:
> No code changes.
>
> Signed-off-by: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
> CC: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
> CC: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> CC: x86@...nel.org
> CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> ---
> arch/x86/math-emu/fpu_entry.c | 29 +++++++++--------------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
This patch should come before riskier patches introducing new instructions, to
make eventual reverts and fixes easier.
The rule is generally: sort patches by risk, low risk first, high risk later. This
means that cleanups, restructuring, refactoring patches always come first - beyond
making bisection and reverts easier, those make subsequent patches cleaner as well
and make any bugs in subsequent patches easier to see as well.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists