[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-c55a6ffa6285e29f874ed403979472631ec70bff@git.kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 01:50:35 -0700
From: tip-bot for Davidlohr Bueso <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Waiman.Long@....com, hpa@...or.com, dave@...olabs.net,
mingo@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, dbueso@...e.de,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org
Subject: [tip:locking/core] locking/osq: Relax atomic semantics
Commit-ID: c55a6ffa6285e29f874ed403979472631ec70bff
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/c55a6ffa6285e29f874ed403979472631ec70bff
Author: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
AuthorDate: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 00:37:24 -0700
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 09:27:29 +0200
locking/osq: Relax atomic semantics
... by using acquire/release for ops around the lock->tail. As such,
weakly ordered archs can benefit from more relaxed use of barriers
when issuing atomics.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@....com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1442216244-4409-3-git-send-email-dave@stgolabs.net
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/locking/osq_lock.c | 11 ++++++++---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c b/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c
index dc85ee2..d092a0c 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/osq_lock.c
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ osq_wait_next(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock,
for (;;) {
if (atomic_read(&lock->tail) == curr &&
- atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->tail, curr, old) == curr) {
+ atomic_cmpxchg_acquire(&lock->tail, curr, old) == curr) {
/*
* We were the last queued, we moved @lock back. @prev
* will now observe @lock and will complete its
@@ -92,7 +92,11 @@ bool osq_lock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock)
node->next = NULL;
node->cpu = curr;
- old = atomic_xchg(&lock->tail, curr);
+ /*
+ * ACQUIRE semantics, pairs with corresponding RELEASE
+ * in unlock() uncontended, or fastpath.
+ */
+ old = atomic_xchg_acquire(&lock->tail, curr);
if (old == OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL)
return true;
@@ -184,7 +188,8 @@ void osq_unlock(struct optimistic_spin_queue *lock)
/*
* Fast path for the uncontended case.
*/
- if (likely(atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->tail, curr, OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL) == curr))
+ if (likely(atomic_cmpxchg_release(&lock->tail, curr,
+ OSQ_UNLOCKED_VAL) == curr))
return;
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists