[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <55FBE029.1000507@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:58:01 +0100
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvmem: core: Handle shift bits in-place if cell->nbits
is non-zero
Hi Axel,
Thanks for the patch
Acked-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
I remember fixing this sometime back which was reported by static
checker reported by Dan Carpenter, I forgot to send it over to wider
audience. Thanks for reminding.
--srini
On 18/09/15 10:50, Axel Lin wrote:
> It's pointless to test (cell->bit_offset || cell->bit_offset).
> nvmem_shift_read_buffer_in_place() should be called when
> (cell->bit_offset || cell->nbits).
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
> ---
> drivers/nvmem/core.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> index d3c6676..c39723a 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> @@ -825,7 +825,7 @@ static int __nvmem_cell_read(struct nvmem_device *nvmem,
> return rc;
>
> /* shift bits in-place */
> - if (cell->bit_offset || cell->bit_offset)
> + if (cell->bit_offset || cell->nbits)
> nvmem_shift_read_buffer_in_place(cell, buf);
>
> *len = cell->bytes;
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists