linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: Fixup clients of multi_reg_write/register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 18 Sep 2015 11:25:24 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	Nariman Poushin <nariman@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mfd: Fixup clients of multi_reg_write/register_patch

On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 09:33:36AM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 01:50:15PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> > It looks like that patch has been forgotten as I am still applying it
> > to the linux-next tree every day ...

> Apologies if I am a little out of my depth here, but are we in
> the situation where you are expecting this to go through the MFD
> tree and Lee is expecting it to go through your tree?

No, -next is a merge down of trees that will be sent to Linus rather
than a tree that is sent to Linus itself.

> Assuming this is the case, Lee could you perhaps pull this fix in
> fairly soon? As it is causing build warning for some configs, in
> Linus's tree at the moment. I am quite happy to resend it on
> Nariman's behalf if required (he is on holiday at the moment).

I'd recommend resending to make sure Lee has the patch.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)