[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150918113412.GF7694@ck-lbox>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 12:34:12 +0100
From: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
CC: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: wm0010: disable regulator on error
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 04:02:19PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> We have done regulator_bulk_enable() while booting the DSP but on the
> error exit path we have not disbled it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@...torindia.org>
> ---
> sound/soc/codecs/wm0010.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm0010.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm0010.c
> index 8434d45..79a7cd3 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm0010.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm0010.c
> @@ -739,8 +739,6 @@ static int wm0010_boot(struct snd_soc_codec *codec)
> abort:
> /* Put the chip back into reset */
> wm0010_halt(codec);
> - mutex_unlock(&wm0010->lock);
> - return ret;
Does wm0010_halt not disable the regulators?
Thanks,
Charles
>
> err_core:
> mutex_unlock(&wm0010->lock);
> --
> 1.9.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists