[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150918124205.GA28272@sudip-pc>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 18:12:05 +0530
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ASoC: wm0010: disable regulator on error
On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 12:34:12PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 04:02:19PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > We have done regulator_bulk_enable() while booting the DSP but on the
> > error exit path we have not disbled it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip@...torindia.org>
> > ---
> > sound/soc/codecs/wm0010.c | 2 --
> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm0010.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm0010.c
> > index 8434d45..79a7cd3 100644
> > --- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm0010.c
> > +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm0010.c
> > @@ -739,8 +739,6 @@ static int wm0010_boot(struct snd_soc_codec *codec)
> > abort:
> > /* Put the chip back into reset */
> > wm0010_halt(codec);
> > - mutex_unlock(&wm0010->lock);
> > - return ret;
>
> Does wm0010_halt not disable the regulators?
oops, yes, it does. Sorry I should have seen it before posting.
patch 2/3 and 3/3 will still apply even if this 1/3 is not applied.
Should I send a v2 leaving out this patch or is it ok to discard this
patch while applying?
regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists