[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150918133708.GA26468@leverpostej>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 14:37:09 +0100
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf tools: session: avoid infinite loop
> > So it looks like I shouldn't have any synthesized events. Have I missed
> > anything?
>
> Yes, you are right. But you are not getting the COMM and MMAP events from
> the exec which means you are killing perf before it execs the workload.
Oh, I see.
> Perf writes through a pipe to its forked child to do the exec, so
> to reproduce it you just need to put everything on the same cpu and play around
> with the sleep number
>
> taskset -c 0 tools/perf/perf record -- sleep 1 & sleep 0.005 ; kill -2 $!
>
> reproduces the problem for me. Of course, since the workload doesn't get exec'ed
> it doesn't matter if it is bogus i.e.
>
> taskset -c 0 tools/perf/perf record -- sdfgsdgdg & sleep 0.005 ; kill -2 $!
>
> also reproduces the problem.
Thanks for confirming!
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists