lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 10:04:28 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> To: Javi Merino <javi.merino@....com> Cc: "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "cw00.choi@...sung.com" <cw00.choi@...sung.com>, "edubezval@...il.com" <edubezval@...il.com>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] devfreq_cooling: add trace information On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 14:55:51 +0100 Javi Merino <javi.merino@....com> wrote: > > A tracepoint does some whacky things, and gcc may not optimize this. > > I've compared the generated assembly on arm, arm64 and x86_64 and both > options generate exactly the same code. Thanks for checking. I was just curious, and I'm wary about trusting gcc to optimize correctly ;-) -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists