[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150918143143.GR11551@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 11:31:43 -0300
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
To: 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI
<masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
"linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@...b.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH perf/core ] [BUGFIX] perf probe: Fix a segfault when
removing uprobe events
Em Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:28:30AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 11:26:22AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Em Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 01:39:13AM +0000, 平松雅巳 / HIRAMATU,MASAMI escreveu:
> > > Could you pull this bugfix as an urgent patch, since this fixes a critical
> > > problem?
> > Sure, thanks for the reminder.
> But it is not applying, checking:
> [acme@zoo linux]$ patch -p1 < /wb/1.patch
> patching file tools/perf/builtin-probe.c
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 380.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file tools/perf/builtin-probe.c.rej
> [acme@zoo linux]$
The way you reported made me somehow think this was for perf/urgent, but
the function it patches is not even there, ok, applying to perf/core.
Applied.
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists