[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150918084356.4bf149a6@yairi>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 08:43:56 -0700
From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Pengyu Ma <pengyu.ma@...driver.com>, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] powercap / RAPL : remove dependency on iosf_mbi
On Fri, 18 Sep 2015 02:09:55 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:
> On Thursday, September 17, 2015 03:31:41 PM Pengyu Ma wrote:
> > iosf_mbi is supported on Quark, Braswell, Baytrail and some Atom
> > SoC, but RAPL is not limited to these SoC, it supports almost Intel
> > CPUs. Remove this dependece to make RAPL support more Intel CPUs.
> >
> > Please select IOSF_MBI on Atom SoCs.
> >
Unlike Quark, I don't think we want to or do differentiate Atom from
other x86 at compile time. IOSF driver can be compiled as a module also,
therefore RAPL driver needs this explicit dependency at compile time.
> > Signed-off-by: Pengyu Ma <pengyu.ma@...driver.com>
>
> Jacob?
>
> > ---
> > drivers/powercap/Kconfig | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/powercap/Kconfig b/drivers/powercap/Kconfig
> > index 85727ef..a7c81b5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/powercap/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/powercap/Kconfig
> > @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ if POWERCAP
> > # Client driver configurations go here.
> > config INTEL_RAPL
> > tristate "Intel RAPL Support"
> > - depends on X86 && IOSF_MBI
> > + depends on X86
> > default n
> > ---help---
> > This enables support for the Intel Running Average Power
> > Limit (RAPL)
> >
>
[Jacob Pan]
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists